$3,880 offer expires on Oct. 29 midnight! (California time)
Full Perennial licenses + free lifetime autoupdates.
Only $3,880 (Regular price: $7,999)


PRODUCTS
SERVICES
RECIPES
PAPERS
REFERENCE

The Modified Simandoux Equation for Water SaturationThe Modified Simandoux Equation is an extension of the equation for shaly rocks to cover the cases where the saturation exponent n ≠ 2. The Simandoux equation of 1963 was one of the first models to successfully incorporate and correct the excess of conductivity in the matrix due to the presence of dispersed clays (the Archie equation of 1942 overestimates amount of water saturation if there are clays). In its common standard version by Bardon and Pied (1969), the equation is:
notice that if n=2, the equation takes the form of a second degree polynomial a.x^{2} + b.x + c = 0 on x=SW, which solution is the regular Simandoux equation. Also, the porosity to be used in the model, is the effective porosity φ_{e} corrected for shale content, not the total porosity φ_{T}. When n≠2, the modified Simandoux equation can be solved by recursive numerical iterations. Start with an approximate guessed solution for SW, like the value found from the regular Simandoux equation, and keep iterating until convergence is reached within a desired numerical difference precision between SW and SW_{guess} (usually 35 iterations are enough):
PROOF OF THE SIMANDOUX EQUATION: The Simandoux equation is usually the default option to work with shaly rocks. However, many clastic reservoirs with "fresh" salinities of less than 20,000 PPM equiv. NaCl behave better with the Indonesia equation. As a general rule, we recommend to consider the use of the Indonesia equation for reservoirs with fresh formation waters, the Simandoux equation for salty reservoirs, and to explore the Fertl equation around α=0.30 if Rsh can not be determined because a pure nearby shale body can not be found in the reservoir. Closed Equation variations for the modified Simandoux modelThere are many ways to modify the regular Simandoux equation to become with closed, noniterative approximations that work well for most of the cases. We show here two fundamental variations: The first variation takes the regular Simandoux equation and avoids iterations by using a custom exponent (2/n), in same style as the Indonesia equation:
The second variation not only uses the Bardon and Pied (1969) χ conductivity term and the custom exponent (2/n). It also applies an inflation factor 1/(1Vsh) to the Archie conductivity term:




Content, and web design © 20122020 GeolOil LLC. You are welcome to refer them. Please give us fair credits under Creative Commons License CCbyND 